|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Windows IT Pro Home
Register
![]()
FAQ for Windows
WinInfo News
Europe Edition
About Us
Contact Us/Customer Service
Media Kit
Affiliates / Licensing
|
||||||||||||||||
SQL Server Magazine
Office & SharePoint Pro
Windows Dev Pro
IT Job Hound
ITTVIT Library
Technical Resources Directory
Connected Home
Windows Excavator
Windows SuperSite |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
According to the second edition of the RED HAT LINUX NETWORK TOOLKIT by Paul G. Sery it's considered a good rule of thumb to allocate 2.5 times the physical RAM to the swap partition for any demand-paged virtual memory Operating Systems.
This Windows KB goes into detail regarding 64-bit OS's, but much of it still applies: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/889654.
There's plenty of opinions out there, but put simply your page file:
1. Should be able to accommodate a full dump of physical memory, so it can't be smaller than your total physical memory.
2. Should have a static size. I don't like keeping the default windows setting of having a different initial and maximum size as I'm suspicious of the amount of system resources being spent trying to continuously(?) caculate the optimal size for the stupid page file.
Personally I use the 2.5, but unless close scrutiny of the perfmon counters mentioned in this and other articles proves different I can't imagine it would make much of a difference.
Tallarico August 04, 2008 (Article Rating: