Windows IT Pro is the authoritative and independent resource for windows nt, windows 2000, windows 2003, windows xp. Features a collection of resources and magazines for windows IT professionals.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


September 03, 2008

Google's Browser Created Out of Fear of Microsoft

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Internet Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

A deep fear of Microsoft drove Google to create its own Web browser, the company's cofounders implicitly admitted Tuesday, though each was careful never to mention the software giant by name. Instead, during a press conference, Google's leaders discussed the benefits of creating its own browser, while tip-toeing around the central issue at hand: The release of Chrome opens a new front in what is increasingly a heated battle with Microsoft for computer users.

"I wouldn't call Chrome the [operating system] of Web apps," Google co-founder Sergey Brin demurred after one-too-many Microsoft-oriented question during yesterday's press conference. "It's a very basic, fast engine to run Web apps. We'll see more and more Web apps of greater and greater sophistication, of the kinds of things that today are pretty challenging to do on the Web because of browser performance."

"Everything we do is running on the Web platform. It's very important to us that it works well," Google co-founder Larry Page added.

Google's explanation for Chrome is that it doesn't have to snag a significant amount of market share to be successful for the company. Instead, all it has to do is influence and inspire the makers of other browsers. If these other browsers--Microsoft Internet Explorer and Mozilla Firefox primarily--improve enough along the lines of Chrome, then that's good for Google. Better Web browsers will lead to better Google Web application experiences and thus, eventually, to more revenues for the company.

OK, fine. But a big part of the thrust behind Chrome is to formalize the notion that Web applications are as capable and "real" as traditional desktop applications. So one of the built-in features of this new browser--a product, that by the way lacks a number of standard features found in competing browsers--is that you can turn any Web application--like Gmail, Google Calendar, or the Google Apps productivity suite--into desktop-like applications that are accessed via standard Windows shortcuts. The goal is to blur the line between traditional applications and Web applications.

And that brings us back to Google's Microsoft fixation. While the company was very careful yesterday never to explicitly mention Microsoft, Google is in fact very much aware that Chrome is reigniting an old debate, started in the mid-1990s days of Netscape--that the browser could replace Windows. At the heart of its decision to create a browser was a desire to not leave the underlying access point for its Web solutions in the hands of its biggest competitor. Google says it wants to go from being an Internet search company to being an Internet search, services, and applications company.

In the short term, other companies have more to fear from Chrome than does Microsoft. Mozilla, for example, has managed to seize almost 20 percent of the Web browser market from IE with its Firefox browser. But Chrome is based partly on Firefox technology, and Firefox users are exactly the kind of people who would be willing to try Chrome. That's not the case with most mainstream Web users, most of whom use IE. And other niche browsers, like Opera and Apple Safari, will likely continue their path to nowhere, with Chrome, Firefox, and IE snapping up the majority of users. The only question, of course, is what the breakdown will be. Will Chrome steal share from Firefox? IE? Or both?

End of Article



Reader Comments
I love Google.

But I'm sticking with Firefox. It runs on Windows, OS X, and 'Nix. And it runs on them *now*.

RunTimeError September 03, 2008 (Article Rating: )


I'll probably use their "application shortcuts" to run windows such as Pandora, so when I click links throughout the day, I don't have to worry about pandora disappearing as the tab gets redirected to the link I wanted to open. Other than that, it's not too interesting for now, not with IE8 coming. It's a little startling to see the application shortcut windows displaying a web page with absolutely NO other controls (not even a back button) though...could be intriguing for public consoles...

My guess is that, unlike most Google software that gets this much notice, it may disappear slowly and quietly. Though Android may be a game-changer, if they do what Apple did with the iPhone and tie the platform and browser together.

james3mg September 03, 2008 (Article Rating: )


I just observed something interesting- I closed my Pandora tab that I had open in IE7 and directed Chrome to pandora's website. After I downloaded the Flash Plugin (nice and easy) for Chrome, it logged me right in to my Pandora account. Is it actually using IE's cookies!!? I'm not sure that's a good thing :-\ I did like that when I created an "application shortcut" to pandora, it just changed the window to their bare-bones "application" window, without forcing me to reload the page! Nice touch.

james3mg September 03, 2008 (Article Rating: )


Last post-in-a-row, promise :)

As a follow-up to my above post, I forgot to mention that I'd told Chrome NOT to import anything from IE.

One missing thing that would have been nice for settings things like gmail up as those Application shortcuts, would be keeping cookies, etc as part of that shortcut. (They'd probably have to do something like the xml-based Office files- the shortcut might actually be a renamed .zip archive with all the pertinent data self-contained (probably encrypted) for the window's use)

For instance, I have two gmail accounts, one for home and one for work. I thought I could set up a different shortcut for each account, but alas, the shortcuts only take me to gmail, logged in as whatever account I LAST logged on to.

The other thing that would be a really nice touch would be the ability to configure the behavior of each Application Shortcut window- for instance, a per-shortcut attribute of how it minimizes/closes (minimize to tray, close to tray, never appear on the taskbar, etc).

...and I have to admit, I miss the search bar, as I've gotten used to using it as a short, temporary "notepad" of sorts while browsing :) But that's a pretty specific-to-me request I wouldn't expect anyone to care about ;)

james3mg September 03, 2008 (Article Rating: )


You wrote:
"Chrome is based partly on Firefox technology"

It's not based on Firefox or Mozilla technology but it does share a rendering engine (WebKit.org) with Apple's Safari (as do the iPhone and Android browsers, and Adobe AIR).

FWIW, if Microsoft would adopt either the WebKit or Gecko (Mozilla) rendering engine inside a future version of Internet Explorer then a lot of the web's compatibility issues would go away. If MS adopted V8 (Chrome) or Tamarin (Mozilla/Adobe) for its JavaScript engine then complaints about IE JScript being slow would go away. MS would not have to give out the source code to IE or even change the branding.

eburnette September 03, 2008 (Article Rating: )


Chrome is based on Webkit, not on Gecko. So Chrome is not partially based on Firefox, but on Konqueror and Safari.

felipe.alfaro September 03, 2008 (Article Rating: )


gosh - i hope they add it automagically to the JAVA security updates or just push it out like I-Tunz did...

sx4sport@hotmail.com September 03, 2008 (Article Rating: )


Sorry Paul, but your first sentence:
A deep fear of Microsoft drove Google to create its own Web browser - wot a load of rubbish! Microsoft has lost an awful lot of credibility during the past 2 years. You have seen the mess the company got into with Yahoo and the quality of it's employees (shall I say some are extremely dubious!).

It goes without question that Google is Number 1 in regard to the web - this new browser simply enhances and strengthens their market share.

ashers2008 September 03, 2008 (Article Rating: )


"Google's Microsoft fixation"

*Aeh*. It's Micros~ that has a Google fixation. Not the other way around.


"with [..] IE snapping up the majority of users"

Funny joke. IE is loosing constantly. Comparing modern browser variants (IE7, FF3, Safari 3), IE has already a less than stellar user share. And with every new version, companies (nowadays the core of IE faithfuls - mostly because IE is "good enough" and cannot be de-installed anyway) become aware of the compatibility nightmare which was created by Microsoft's "we don't care for standards" attitude.
Feature-wise, IE is already irrelevant - reproducing only existing features from other browsers with hardly any unique benefits (apart from the security black-hole named ActiveX).

And I don't believe that Safari is going nowhere. Last time I looked, it's core technology was part of Nokia S60, Android, Chrome, QT, several other browser projects (mostly *nix-based) and runs on several different hardware and software platforms going from mobile to desktop. I can't say the same from IE. Looking from that point of view, the future of IE looks rather dark (which is good - Micros~ is not the company that cares for open standards and the common good anyway).

MysterMask September 04, 2008 (Article Rating: )


You must log on before posting a comment.

If you don't have a username & password, please register now.




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
The Memory-Optimization Hoax

Don't believe the hype. At best, RAM optimizers have no effect. At worst, they seriously degrade performance. ...

Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 24, 2008

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including a Vista Capable dismissal request, Zune price reductions, Morrow musings, Novell and Microsoft sitting in a tree ... two years later, Yahoo!, IE 6 on Windows Mobile, and so much more ...


Related Events Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Become a VIP member of the Windows IT Pro community!
Get it all with the VIP CD and VIP access. A $500+ value for only $279!

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!
Solve your toughest technical problems with our experts and access 10,000 + articles online. 30% off

Monthly Online Pass - Only $5.95!
Get instant access to 10,000+ articles from Windows IT Pro Magazine!

TechNet Virtual Labs
Evaluate and test Microsoft's newest products.


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro Windows Dev Pro IT Job Hound ITTV
IT Library Technology Resource Directory Connected Home Windows Excavator Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 Copyright © 2008 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Terms and Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints and Licensing