I could argue that Windows Vista, Office 2007, and the looming Longhorn Server
aren't Microsoft's most strategically significant launches of 2007. If you're
thinking I've lost my mind and you're ready to email me Microsoft's latest revenue
numbers, indulge me for a minute: Aside from security, management is the most
expensive and time-consuming aspect of Microsoft's products in a network environment.
(And security is arguably a management issue.) The new System Center family
of products is Microsoft's venture to simplify systems management and assure
the health of Microsoft servers and applications. In terms of customer retention
and enterprise worthiness, System Center is at least as crucial to Microsoft's
continued market dominance as the big revenue-producing products. So while industry
attention has been fixed on Vista, Office, and Longhorn, Microsoft launched
System Center Operations Manager (Ops Manager) and System Center Essentials
(SCE). In the wings is a particularly interesting member of this family: System
Center Virtual Machine Manager (VMM). Virtualization is poised to become the
most disruptive technology since the commoditization of server hardware. And
therefore, I think VMM, which lets you manage virtualized environments, might
be Microsoft's most strategically important launch of 2007.
Early Days
According to David Greschler, a Microsoft director of strategic virtualization,
IDC estimates that only "5 to 6 percent of all servers in North America are
virtualized today." But Microsoft sees huge potential for VMM. David said, "It's
clear that to unlock the value of that next phase of virtualization, you need
management. If you don't know where your machines are and can't remotely control
or move them, you're not getting the benefit virtualization offers as a key
enabler to building dynamic servers and software on demand. This is an important
release because it allows people to really take advantage of virtualization."
Of course, VMM is not the first or the only tool for managing virtual environments.
But David says two differentiators set VMM apart from competing products. First,
"customers want a single management platform for both the physical and the virtual.
Other products have tools to manage just the physical or just the virtual."
Second, VMM lets you "apply all the rich System Center functionality to the
virtual world. VMM has a management pack that ties into MOM so you can monitor
the health of virtual machines at the same level of granularity as you can monitor
physical machines."
Considering competing products such as VMware led me to ask whether VMM lets
you manage heterogeneous virtual environments. My translation of Microsoft's
answer: Not really. Edwin Yuen, a technical product manager for VMM,
replied, "We manage Virtual Server 2005 instances in this release. With Virtual
Server 2005's ability to run heterogeneous OSs, VMM can do things like turn
them on and off and provision them. Certain advanced features of VMM may not
work—[Physical-to-Virtual conversion] P2V and other features (such as
integration with certain monitoring levels) are restricted to the Windows platform."
Features
VMM is currently in its beta 2 release and available for free public download
at http://www.microsoft.com/scvmm.
The features in this release include:
a new Outlook-like UI
support for Windows PowerShell
P2V conversion (P2V is possible only with Windows Server 2003 and Windows
Server 2000)
Virtual-to-Virtual (V2V) conversion—using the PowerShell interface
in VMM beta 2, you can convert a VMWare disk or virtual machine (VM) to a
Virtual Server 2005 Virtual Hard Disk (VHD)
64-bit server support
the ability to remotely install every VMM component, including the VMM
server, library server, delegated provisioning portal, administrative console,
and data store
Veridian
Naturally, I wanted to know whether VMM would support the Longhorn hypervisor
(i.e., the platform-level virtualization capability built on the Longhorn Server
Core and codenamed Veridian). My translation of Microsoft's answer: Not right
now. David said that VMM is scheduled to RTM "this fall for Virtual Server,
including Virtual Server R2 SP1. Then in Q4, within a couple weeks of the beta
release of Veridian, we'll have a VMM beta to support that form of virtualization,
as well. In the first half of 2008, when Veridian RTMs, we will simultaneously
ship VMM."
Significant or Not?
I recently wrote that virtualization seems to be the answer to every question
these days. VMM is Microsoft's answer to how to deploy and maintain a virtual
environment. Are you still thinking I've lost my mind? Then go ahead and send
me those emails!
End of Article
Wow... So Microsoft is finally coming out with a tool to manage all host servers at once. Of course, VMware had this 3 years ago with Virtual Center.
You know, my big question is, why is Microsoft so intent on competing in the Virtual Server market? They bought a third-party company for millions of dollars a few years back, they've spent untold millions updating and supporting that product, and then they give the product away for free..
Yes, the more VMs out there, the more Windows licenses they will sell... But VMware was already providing them with that. Why didn't they just partner with VMware and help VMware's product succeed? It would have been much less costly for Microsoft with all the same benefits, and better for consumers too, since VMware's product are so vastly superior to Microsoft's.
Why this insane need to compete in everything? Recap... they've spent millions and millions, and they give the product away for free. Why? I'd like to see an article about that.
Note that it's still more cost-effective to pay for VMware ESX, because you can get more VMs per physical server with VMware.
For example, say a 4-processor server with lots of memory costs about $25,000 and you can get about 20 VMs on it using ESX, and 12 VMs on it with Microsoft Virtual Server... and an ESX license costs $10k, and Virtual Server is free...
Cost for 240 VMs ESX - $35,000 x 12 physical servers = $420,000 MS - $25,000 x 20 physical servers = $500,000
So even in hard costs (not counting the vastly superior management features of ESX), ESX is still cheaper.
rrosenkoetter July 13, 2007 (Article Rating: )
Like many other business endeavors, the primary issue is producing revenue: Package less product in a larger box, up the price, slap a "New and Improved" sticker on it, and do some marketing. Aside from the basic OS Microsoft has repeatedly only reached "also ran" status with products (zume zume zume).
The major benefit of virtualization is the ability to increase server density while delaying the replacement of HVAC and UPS systems in the data center. Backing up the VM files also provides the opportunity to provide business continuity more rapidly than spending days rebuilding several windows devices.
Microsoft late Tuesday made changes to its Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) Notifications anti-piracy service in Windows XP, a change that should begin appearing on users' desktops over the next few months. The company says it made the changes in order ...
Master SharePoint with 3 eLearning Seminars Learn how to build a better SharePoint infrastructure and enable powerful collaboration with MVPs Dan Holme and Michael Noel. Register today!
SharePointConnections Conference Fall 2008 Don’t miss the premier event for Microsoft IT Professionals in Las Vegas, November 10-13. Register and book your room by August 25 and receive a FREE room night (based on a three night minimum stay).
VMworld 2008 - Sign Up Today! Join your peers on September 15-18 at The Venetian Hotel in Las Vegas as VMware hosts VMworld 2008, the leading Virtualization event.
Microsoft® Tech•Ed EMEA 2008 IT Professionals Advance your thinking with new ideas and practical real-world solutions at Microsoft’s FIVE day technical infrastructure conference 3-7 Nov., 2008. Register before 26 September 2008 to save €300.
Order Your SQL Fundamentals CD Today! Learn how to use SQL Server, understand Office integration techniques and dive into the essentials of SQL Express and Visual Basic with this free SQL Fundamentals CD.
Are You Really Compliant with Software Regulations? View this web seminar that will help you with compliance best practices and check out a management solution to assure that you won’t be in jeopardy of an audit.
You know, my big question is, why is Microsoft so intent on competing in the Virtual Server market? They bought a third-party company for millions of dollars a few years back, they've spent untold millions updating and supporting that product, and then they give the product away for free..
Yes, the more VMs out there, the more Windows licenses they will sell... But VMware was already providing them with that. Why didn't they just partner with VMware and help VMware's product succeed? It would have been much less costly for Microsoft with all the same benefits, and better for consumers too, since VMware's product are so vastly superior to Microsoft's.
Why this insane need to compete in everything? Recap... they've spent millions and millions, and they give the product away for free. Why? I'd like to see an article about that.
Note that it's still more cost-effective to pay for VMware ESX, because you can get more VMs per physical server with VMware.
For example, say a 4-processor server with lots of memory costs about $25,000 and you can get about 20 VMs on it using ESX, and 12 VMs on it with Microsoft Virtual Server... and an ESX license costs $10k, and Virtual Server is free...
Cost for 240 VMs
ESX - $35,000 x 12 physical servers = $420,000
MS - $25,000 x 20 physical servers = $500,000
So even in hard costs (not counting the vastly superior management features of ESX), ESX is still cheaper.
rrosenkoetter July 13, 2007 (Article Rating: