Windows IT Pro is the authoritative and independent resource for windows nt, windows 2000, windows 2003, windows xp. Features a collection of resources and magazines for windows IT professionals.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


August 2004

Time for a Windows Antivirus Solution

Microsoft needs to act on its oft-stated commitment to security
RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Antivirus Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

With apologies to today's third-party antivirus vendors, I think it's time that Microsoft included an antivirus solution as a part of the base Windows OS. Desktop security is simply too crucial a concern to Microsoft—and more important, to Microsoft's customers—for a component that's so vital to a secure environment to remain an optional add-on. As long as antivirus measures reside solely in the hands of third-party vendors, large numbers of Microsoft OS installations will remain vulnerable to hundreds if not thousands of exploits, not all of which can be prevented through patching.

The Competition Question
I know that software vendors believe (often rightfully) that Microsoft eventually swallows up Windows third-party markets after it includes competing features as a part of Windows. Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) is probably the best example of that fear made manifest. At one time, Netscape Navigator held the lion's share of the desktop browser market, but soon after Microsoft bundled IE into Windows, Navigator became a footnote to Internet history.

Despite that fateful event, however, other browser choices, such as Mozilla and Opera Software's Opera Web browser, remain on the market. And I'd argue that, in the long run, Microsoft better served its customers by including a browser as part of the basic OS. Although the eventual role of the Internet wasn't clear all those years ago, Internet access has since become an essential part of today's computing experience.

Third-party software vendors' products also compete successfully with built-in Windows tools in many other niches. For example, even though Windows XP has built-in .zip file access, utilities such as WinZip Computing's WinZip have gathered a healthy following. Likewise, even though Microsoft has offered a version of Paint in every version of Windows, Adobe Photoshop is still widely used. Both third-party tools provide additional value beyond that of Windows' built-in tools.

The Case for Integrated Antivirus Protection
Since Microsoft has seen fit to include IE, Windows Firewall, and even nonessential items such as Windows Media Player (WMP), Microsoft Photo Editor, and Windows Movie Maker as part of the base OS, it only makes sense for Windows to also include antivirus software, an essential system security component. Of course, integrating antivirus software into the OS might hurt some third-party antivirus vendors in the short term. But as in other areas in which Windows offerings compete with third-party tools, vendors have the option to extend their products' feature set and abilities beyond a basic Microsoft offering. For example, some vendors might strengthen their products' network antivirus protection; others might concentrate on providing rapid protection against new worms and viruses.

Over the past couple of years, Microsoft has often stated that security is its top priority. In an April address at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmar asserted that Microsoft has an important role to play in securing the computing environment across the globe, stating that "All of us in the IT business are permanently in the security business as well." But until Windows includes built-in antivirus protection, Microsoft's claim that security is its top priority isn't credible. Just as bundling IE gave Internet access to more customers than Navigator ever could have and fostered the use of the Internet, integrated antivirus protection is requisite to enabling a basic level of security in today's Internet-connected environments.

A Necessary Step
Microsoft has already added numerous features to the OS that have questionable value to the user. Antivirus is one area in which Microsoft involvement is actually needed, and the value of built-in antivirus protection to Microsoft—and especially its customers—is both significant and obvious.

End of Article



Reader Comments
I don't think a Microsoft antivirus would be a good solution: Why should we, the users, take the risk of another Microsoft program that could be as flawed and frequently attacked as IE and Outlook?

No. I think Microsoft just did the right thing with XP SP2: The Security Center applet in Control Panel gives sufficient advise to the user about the need to install a third-party antivirus solution and integrates with some of them (I use F-Prot) and clearly notifies if it's up-to-date.

I know third-party solutions can also be target for spammers and virus writers, but as there are many antivirus solutions, the chance of getting a virus that disables all of them at once is lower than the chance of getting a virus that disable Microsoft solution, being just one.

fabioesquivel July 27, 2004 (Article Rating: )


I think Microsoft should include some type of basic anti-virus solution for home users and desktops. So many home users still do not understand the implications of failing to utilize anti-virus products, and certainly do not understand that anti-virus MUST be updated, not just installed.

Let's help those low on the Bell Curve, and we can help the world of computing.

wosully July 27, 2004 (Article Rating: )


Finally! I've been crying for Microsoft to put there efforts into built-in antirus for 5 years. Finally someone in the press is asking for the same thing and not blaming it on how windows users having been demanding enough. Anti-virus protection is intrinsic in an operating system. Why hasn't MS done it sooner? Money! They signed deals with AV vendors and they get a cut from them and they didn't have to life a finger. Why would MS suddenly change it's mind? Oh not because it's the right thing to do, no, no. Get that out of your head. They would change their mind because of what else: Money! The bad security rep is starting to hurt MS in the wallet and only now are they taking notice that anti-virus should be built in. That's the bottom line folks.

dannomite July 28, 2004 (Article Rating: )


Although I think that Fabio's point about multiple vendors making engine targeting attacks harder is legitimate, in my experience with end users the vast majority of infections/malware occur on systems where there is NO virus protection whatsoever. A simple, generic solution could significantly raise the barrier to virus spread on. Since spam remailing trojans are a large part of the problem, it could have an impact on THAT problem as well.
To have near-term impact, such a tool would probably need to be made available for WinXP and higher (lots of people use Windows Update, so it makes a great distribution medium). This cuts out the large portion of home systems which are still running Win9x/Me, but I can't see a new simple solution being made available for systems that far back.

Alex K Angelopoulos August 02, 2004 (Article Rating: )


Win XP has a firewall - but who knows how to wisely tune it? Same about an antivirus for all. Security-conscious users already have one. Others will disable the default antivirus, or will leave it with the default configuration. Throw away the antiviruses! Rather the users should be taught what link to click.

The article is pointless - "well, look, others will also have a little slice of the pie anyway", "we need more security - let's ship it with the OS" - but this is not the only solution. Besides, why should I pay extra penny for the OS licence (a/v software costs included), and then use a third-party antivirus? Inclusion of the software should be FORBIDDEN. It should be an option which the customer chooses.

tratata August 09, 2004 (Article Rating: )


i think MS should write some anti-virus software but i do not think it should be put on Windows by default. this reduces the user's choice, like bundling ie with Windows reduces most users' need to use any other browser, thereby stifling competition.
speaking as someone who has the job as supporting MS OSs and apps, i do not want another buggy, unreliable piece of software coming from MS to deal with. in comparison to MS, most other vendors' software is much better written and takes must less effort to support and maintain. if MS want to write anti-virus software, fine, but they should not assume that everyone should use it. users should have the choice of what they want to install.

Dan0101001 August 10, 2004 (Article Rating: )


So why doesn't MS just ship Windows and Windows Advanced?

One with just windows - no browser, no firewall, no movie maker and all the other bloat that means a standard install onto a 4GB partition can not apply service pack 2 because there is not enough space, and one with all that stuff for joe average to use.

It's not the development costs - It's simply because if people could choose to spend less on the OS and more on other software, some would.

The thing is that the cut down version would need to have "just the facts" - ie just be able to manage your files, run your hardware, and let you install software - that way joe sixpack would still want the full version on his home computer so he could browse the net etc.

Anonymous User December 09, 2004


You must log on before posting a comment.

If you don't have a username & password, please register now.




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 24, 2008

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including a Vista Capable dismissal request, Zune price reductions, Morrow musings, Novell and Microsoft sitting in a tree ... two years later, Yahoo!, IE 6 on Windows Mobile, and so much more ...

Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...

PsExec

This freeware utility lets you execute processes on a remote system and redirect output to the local system. ...


Security Whitepapers The Impact of Messaging and Web Threats

Why SaaS is the Right Solution for Log Management

Protecting (You and) Your Data with Exchange Server 2007

Related Events Top 10 Email Security Challenges and Solutions

Introduction to Identity Lifecycle Manager "2"

SQL Server Security: How to Secure, Monitor & Audit Your Databases

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

Security eBooks Spam Fighting and Email Security for the 21st Century

Understanding and Leveraging Code Signing Technologies

A Guide to Windows Certification and Public Keys

Related Security Resources Become a VIP member of the Windows IT Pro community!
Get it all with the VIP CD and VIP access. A $500+ value for only $279!

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!
Solve your toughest technical problems with our experts and access 10,000 + articles online. 30% off

Monthly Online Pass - Only $5.95!
Get instant access to 10,000+ articles from Windows IT Pro Magazine!

TechNet Virtual Labs
Evaluate and test Microsoft's newest products.


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro Windows Dev Pro IT Job Hound ITTV
IT Library Technology Resource Directory Connected Home Windows Excavator Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 Copyright © 2008 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Terms and Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints and Licensing